Meadville Tribune

Local News

June 12, 2008

Judge tells Micelli to stay away from Jordan

06/13/08 — Meadville resident Lisa A. Miceli has been court-ordered to have no further communication or contact in any way with former National Basketball Association superstar Michael Jordan.

She also isn’t permitted to contact any Jordan family members or representatives.

In a court ruling issued Thursday, Crawford County Court of Common Pleas President Judge Gordon Miller granted Jordan’s request for a permanent injunction against Miceli, effective immediately.

Jordan filed the motion of an injunction claiming Miceli has breached a contract the two had signed in 2004. The issue involves the paternity of Miceli’s son. After a first paternity test indicated Jordan was not the father, the pair agreed that if a second DNA test showed the same result, Miceli wouldn’t engage in any further communication of any kind with Jordan or any member of his family or representatives.

The second DNA tests also excluded Jordan as the father. However, Jordan claimed that since Aug. 25, 2005, Miceli has sent nearly 400 e-mails and notes to him or his representatives as well as made hundreds of telephone calls.

Miceli has argued that the paternity testing could have been manipulated by Jordan to produce the negative result

In his order Thursday, Miller wrote that it’s regrettable Miceli chose to represent herself in recent legal proceedings. “It is obvious that she doesn’t, or isn’t willing, to grasp what this suit is about. This is a contract action, not a paternity action,” he said.

He wrote that Jordan set forth facts and theories in his lawsuit and Miceli was by law required to address each of those issues.

Instead, she filed 33 paragraphs of which “nearly all of her allegations have absolutely no relevance to this contract action. Defendant (Miceli) seems to be writing a novel rather than filing a pleading in the nature of an answer,” Miller wrote.

Miceli admitted to making attempts to directly contact Jordan by phone and e-mails. However, she said she is unsure if Jordan received any of them. She said all the e-mails and phone calls she made served a legal purpose, an admission she did attempt to communicate with Jordan or his representatives.

Miller ruled Miceli’s answer was “wholly inadequate.” He said Miceli admitted she entered into the contract, agreed to the terms, but still attempted to contact Jordan. “She does not raise any affirmative defenses,” he wrote.

The judge said the injunction is necessary to prevent a legal wrong — in this case, alleged improper communication — for which there is no adequate remedy at law except for the injunction.

Miller said he will not give Miceli an opportunity to file an amended answer.

He noted he reminded Miceli three times — twice during court appearances and once during a court memorandum and order in April — that this suit was a breach of contract, not a paternity suit.

“The defendant has had an ample opportunity to focus on what this suit is all about and to respond accordingly by, for instance, filing an appropriate answer or seeking to amend the answer prior to this day. We see no benefit in giving her an opportunity to amend her answer,” he concluded.

Miller warned Miceli in court during a recent hearing that if he entered an injunction, he expected her to follow the order. She responded she would go to jail first.

Miceli wasn’t available for comment about Thursday’s order.

Text Only
Local News
Business Marquee
AP Video
Pop Music Superstar Whitney Houston Dies at 48 Police: Houston Found Dead in Her Hotel Room Paul Suffers Narrow Loss to Romney in Maine Recording Superstar Whitney Houston Dead at 48 Maine GOP Chairman Says Romney Wins Caucuses Palin Brings Anti-Washington Message to CPAC Obama Scraps Birth Control Mandate US Airmen's Killer Sentenced to Life in Germany Navy Names Ship for Gabrielle Giffords Raw Video: Deadly Blasts in Syria Romney Slams President Obama at CPAC Gingrich: Pres. Obama 'waging War on Religion' 5 Killed in Wrong-way Crash on I-10 in La. Uzbek Man Pleads Guilty in Plot to Kill Obama Denver's Largest-Ever Drug Bust Nets Dozens Marines: No Punishment for Nazi-like Flag Vets Look to Translate Military Skills Into Jobs Raw Video: School Bus Burst Into Flames LA School Reopens Amid Sex Abuse Scandal $25B Settlement Reached Over Foreclosure Abuses
Poll

A clean-energy plan to use solar energy in eastern Pennsylvania has been met with resistance, even by environmental groups. Do you think solar energy has a future as a valuable energy source in Pennsylvania?

Yes, as the technology improves (and is needed), get these systems up and running as quickly as possible.
Yes, and the efficient, clean energy is needed — but take some time to do it right and environment-friendly.
No, solar energy is not the right choice for Pennsylvania; the environmental risk is too great.
     View Results
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Popular Searches
Powered by Local.com
Stocks